Clean hands? Don't be foolish. No side of a war can claim to have bloodless hands and I as a strategist certainly do not possess them. Nor do I doubt that COST has done their fair share of bloodletting considering what must be done to preserve history as it is currently shaped; maybe they will even ensure that the deaths of my lost loved ones happen in the future in the same violent ways that they happened.
But I have yet to hear even from the mouths of your agents why the Regency's definition of peace is a good thing. They merely insist that it is. Countering the reality of your own brutality with the brutality of your enemies is hardly a good argument for swaying others onto your side and all in all is a poor strategy.
Unless, of course, you don't actually care to do so and merely wish to damage morale.
no subject
But I have yet to hear even from the mouths of your agents why the Regency's definition of peace is a good thing. They merely insist that it is. Countering the reality of your own brutality with the brutality of your enemies is hardly a good argument for swaying others onto your side and all in all is a poor strategy.
Unless, of course, you don't actually care to do so and merely wish to damage morale.