gerechtigkeit: ([mahnung] Wings won't take me)
sᴀʙᴇʀ ᴏꜰ ʙʟᴀᴄᴋ :: pǝᴉɹɟƃǝᴉs ([personal profile] gerechtigkeit) wrote in [community profile] agoge2018-04-17 08:30 pm

FROM: @WEHFRIED || TO: @ALL (backdated like hell, aka before spiderland)

Before Gallipoli, it was discussed that we should come up with aliases to call each other, and have backstories to speak of while there was downtime in the war. At the time, we knew the Regency was there, but they wouldn't be so visible. It was enough to not be asked too much by the natives of the time, and allowed us the conditions we needed to blend in as a unit of reinforcements that was beached at the wrong location.

The situation may be different here, but I'd suggest we come up with different aliases from before, considering we'll be facing the Regency out in the open. Using your actual name isn't suggested- it could cause problems and endanger the rest of this cell if you do so. Try to pick something you'll remember easily enough.

Feel free to suggest names and ideas for yourselves, or help others. The BCE has a list of them you can pick from. The sooner we can compile a list, the easier it will make it for all of us to recall while in the middle of the mission.


[Boy, talking like this is a reminder of speaking with soldiers before battles. That was a long time ago, and he's getting back into the hang of it. Also, guess who's bad at suggesting names? THIS GUY. Thankfully, the BCE has a posh name generator that can be found here.]
prizeneck: (67)

[personal profile] prizeneck 2018-04-18 05:48 pm (UTC)(link)
was there any way they could've gotten that information from you and you don't remember
lonelywar: (39)

[personal profile] lonelywar 2018-04-18 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
In Paris, I was not as attentive with using a false identity as I should have been. It was only a few occasions, but it is enough to think this is how they might have discovered my identity.
But this is only for myself. I am not the only one whom they seemed to know so much about, as others here have mentioned.
prizeneck: (56)

[personal profile] prizeneck 2018-04-18 09:29 pm (UTC)(link)
hrm
not very conclusive
still to have you through some torturing process and not killing you straight away seems kinda counterintuitive if they had that much information about you
what did they want
lonelywar: (and then shit got serious)

[personal profile] lonelywar 2018-04-18 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)
They did not want information. They had everything I could have possibly told them about myself. I would wager that they had far more than that, even.

I believe they wanted me to doubt. They undermined my perception of COST, attempted to make me doubt what I had been told.
I believe they might think us to be valuable resources to them in the future, and this is why we have been safeguarded up to this point.